FORMULATION & EVALUATION OF ENTERIC COATED TABLETS OF ESOMEPRAZOLE

Authors

  • Umesh Jadhav Mittal Institute of Pharmacy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to formulate and evaluate delayed release enteric coated tablets of Esomeprazole using enteric coated polymer Methacrylic acid Copolymer Type A. Tablets are prepared by using approved excipients, which were proved compatible with the active ingredient by IR studies. The method adopted for development was Wet granulation. Core tablets were evaluated for physical parameters like hardness, friability, thickness and disintegration time. Core tablets were sub-coated using Instacoat IC-Ms-2321 (HPMC + Ethyl Cellulose) with buildup of 3%w/w and enteric coating with Instacoat IN-II-062 (Methacrylic acid Copolymer Type A) with an average weight buildup of 5%, 10%, & 15% w/w. The disintegration of enteric coated tablets i.e. formulations with 5% weight buildup (F5a to F5c) in 0.1N HCL could not pass the test. However formulations with 10% & 15% weight buildup (F5d to F5i) showed no disintegration in 0.1N HCL for a period of 2hrs. Dissolution of enteric coated tablets (F5d to F5i) in 0.1N HCL, followed by phosphate buffer pH 6.8, was found satisfactory, where dissolution profile of 15% weight buildup tablets were faster compared to 10% w/w tablets. Among the formulation tested, tablets with 15% weight buildup showed minimum release in 0.1N HCl and the complete release in pH 6.8 phosphate buffers. Further, based on the tablets evaluation results, the formulation F5h was selected as the optimized formulation. The stability studies of the selected formulation showed that the product was stable throughout the study period (90 days).
Keywords: Esomeprazole, Sub-coating, Instacoat IN-II-062, Enteric coating, Instacoat IC-MS-2321, stability studies.

References

Jain k k. Drug Delivery Systems. Humana press; 2008:217 2. Shargel L, Wu-Pong S, Yu ABC. Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinectics; 5thed: The McGraw –Hill companies; 2005: 515-523. 3. Dutta S, Sengupta M. Modified release dosage form and drug delivery. JPR. 2009; 2(11):1728-9. 4. Allen LV, Popovich NG, Ansel HC. Ansel’s Pharmaceutical Dosage forms and Drug Delivery Systems. 18th ed: New Delhi: B.I Publications Pvt. Ltd;2005: 282. 5. Remington. The science and practice of pharmacy. 20th ed: B.I. Publications Pvt. Ltd: 2000; 1: 858-862. 6. Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed: Bombay: Varghese publishing house; 1987. 7. Lieberman HA, Lachman L, Schwartz JB. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: tablets. 2nd ed:New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2005:3: 77-160.

http:// www.Pharmainfo.net

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/peptic_ulcer

http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/digestive diseases.

Remington.The science and practice of pharmacy. 20th ed: B.I. Publications

Panacea Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016:5(2);46-50

International Journal

Umesh Jadhav FORMULATION & EVALUATION OF ENTERIC COATED TABLETS OF ESOMEPRAZOLE

Pvt. Ltd.; 2000; 2:1083-1085, 1225-1226. 12. Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL. Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis Of Therapeutics. 11th ed: Mc Graw-Hill; 2006.

http://www.drugs.com/mmx/omeprazole.html

www.drugs.com/omep:an over view 15. Singh R. Omeprazole: An Overview: The Pharmaceutical Magazine Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur; 2008:1-2. 16. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Owen SC. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 5thed: the pharmaceutical press; 2006. 17. Zimmermann AE, Walters JK, Katona BG, Souney PE, Levine D. A Review of Omeprazole Use in the Treatment of Acid-Related Disorders in Children. Clinical Therapeutics. 200l; 23(5),:660-79. 18. Welage LS, Berardi RR. Evaluation of Omeprazole, Lansoprazole, Pantoprazole, and Rabeprazole in the Treatment of Acid-Related Diseases. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2000; 40(1). 19. Andersson T, Bergstrand R, Cederberg C. Influence of acid secretory status on absorption of omeprazole from enteric coated granules. Br J Clin Pharmac. 1991; 31:275-8. 20. Hsu T-C, Su C-F, Leu S-C, Huang P-C, Wang T-E, Chu C-H. Omeprazole is more effective than a histamine H2-receptor blocker for maintaining a persistent elevation of gastric pH after colon resection for cancer. The American Journal of Surgery. 2004; 187:20-3. 21. Turkoglu M, Varol H, elikok MC. Tableting and stability evaluation of enteric-coated omeprazole pellets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004; 57(2):279-286. 22. Hashmat D, Shoaib MH, Mehmood ZA, Bushra R, Yousuf RI, Lakhani F. Development of Enteric Coated Flurbiprofen Tablets using Opdry/acryl-eze System- A Technical Note. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008; 9(1):116-21. 23. Bozdag S, Calis S, Sumnu M. Formulation and in vitro Evaluation of Enteric Coated Omeprazole Tablets. Pharmaceutical Journal of Slovenia. 1997;48:336-37.

Published

2017-05-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Article