A REVIEW STUDY ON APPLIED IMPORTANCE OF PRAMANA SHARIR IN RACHANA SHARIR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23751344Keywords:
Pramana Sharir, Rachana Sharir, Anthropometry, Body Measurement, Ayurveda Anatomy, Human ProportionsAbstract
Background: Pramana Sharir is a unique anatomical and anthropometric concept described in Ayurveda that deals with the measurement and proportional assessment of the human body. Classical texts such as Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, and Ashtanga Hridaya emphasize the importance of body measurements for determining normal growth, structural integrity, longevity, strength, and overall health status. In Rachana Sharir, Pramana Sharir serves as a fundamental tool for understanding anatomical dimensions, bodily proportions, and individual variations. The concept provides valuable information regarding ideal body constitution, diagnosis of abnormalities, assessment of physical development, and prediction of health outcomes. The principles of Pramana Sharir also demonstrate significant relevance to modern anthropometry and anatomical sciences. Therefore, understanding its applied importance in Rachana Sharir is essential for integrating classical anatomical knowledge with contemporary medical sciences. Aim: To review the applied importance of Pramana Sharir in Rachana Sharir. Objectives: To study the concept of Pramana Sharir described in Ayurvedic literature. To evaluate its anatomical significance in Rachana Sharir. To correlate classical body measurements with modern anthropometric concepts. Material and Methods: Classical Ayurvedic texts including Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, Ashtanga Hridaya, and contemporary literature were reviewed. Relevant references concerning Pramana Sharir and anatomical measurements were collected. The available information was critically analyzed and interpreted. Observation and Results: Review of classical literature revealed that Pramana Sharir provides standardized methods for assessing body dimensions and proportionality. The concept plays a vital role in understanding anatomical structures, constitutional assessment, and prognostic evaluation. Many principles show similarities with modern anthropometry and anatomical measurement techniques. Discussion: Pramana Sharir establishes the scientific basis of body measurement in Ayurveda and contributes significantly to anatomical studies. Its application in Rachana Sharir helps in understanding structural variations and clinical assessment of individuals. Conclusion: Pramana Sharir is an essential component of Rachana Sharir that facilitates accurate anatomical evaluation and constitutional assessment. Its principles remain relevant in modern anthropometric and anatomical research.
Downloads
References
Agnivesha. Charaka Samhita, revised by Charaka and Dridhabala, edited by Acharya YT. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2017. DOI: Not applicable.
Sushruta. Sushruta Samhita, edited by Acharya YT. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2018. DOI: Not applicable.
Vagbhata. Ashtanga Hridaya, edited by Paradkar HS. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan; 2016. DOI: Not applicable.
Sharma PV. Charaka Samhita, English Translation. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2014. DOI: Not applicable.
Sharma PV. Sushruta Samhita, English Translation. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Visvabharati; 2013. DOI: Not applicable.
Murthy KRS. Ashtanga Hridaya, English Translation. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Krishnadas Academy; 2012. DOI: Not applicable.
Lahange SM, Bhangare A. Pramana Sharir: An ancient method of measurement of body constituents. J Nat Ayurvedic Med. 2019;3(4):000210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/jonam-16000210
Kumar A, Singh R. Anthropometry in Ayurveda w.s.r. to Sushrutokta Angula Pramana Sharira. Int J Adv Res. 2017;5(6):1850-1854. DOI: Not available.
Casadei K, Kiel J. Anthropometric Measurement. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. DOI: Not applicable.
World Health Organization. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series 854. Geneva: WHO; 1995. DOI: Not applicable.
Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999;82(3):165-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114599001348
Himes JH. Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1991. DOI: Not applicable.
Wells JC, Fewtrell MS. Measuring body composition. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(7):612-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.085522
Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going SB. Human Body Composition. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2005. DOI: Not applicable.
Norton K, Olds T. Anthropometrica: A textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. Sydney: UNSW Press; 1996. DOI: Not applicable.

