CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF VATARAKTA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO GOUT

Authors

  • Dr. Sahil Mehla P.G. Dept. of Kayachikitsa, Kunwar Shekhar Vijendra Ayurved Medical College & Research Centre, Gangoh, Saharanpur – 247341
  • Dr. Anand Pratap Singh P.G. Dept. of Kayachikitsa, Kunwar Shekhar Vijendra Ayurved Medical College & Research Centre, Gangoh, Saharanpur – 247341
  • Dr. Nitin Goel P.G. Dept. of Kayachikitsa, Kunwar Shekhar Vijendra Ayurved Medical College & Research Centre, Gangoh, Saharanpur – 247341

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21952688

Keywords:

Vatarakta; Gout; Vata; Rakta; Hyperuricemia; Monosodium urate

Abstract

Background: Vatarakta is an important disease described in Ayurveda in which aggravated Vata and vitiated Rakta interact through reciprocal obstruction and aggravation, producing severe pain, swelling, discoloration, burning and functional limitation, often beginning in the distal joints. Gout is a crystal-induced inflammatory arthritis caused by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in and around joints. The marked involvement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, episodic severe pain, erythema and swelling seen in gout provide a clinically useful basis for comparison with selected presentations of Vatarakta. A conceptual analysis can clarify convergent mechanisms while preserving the distinct diagnostic frameworks of Ayurveda and contemporary biomedicine. Aim To critically review the Ayurvedic concept of Vatarakta with special reference to the pathogenesis, clinical features and contemporary understanding of gout. Objectives To review the classical Ayurvedic description of Vatarakta under Nidana, Samprapti, Purvarupa, Rupa, Bheda and Chikitsa Siddhanta. To summarize the contemporary pathophysiology and characteristic clinical features of gout. To compare the Ayurvedic and biomedical disease models without assuming complete diagnostic identity. Materials and Methods: A narrative conceptual review was undertaken using major Ayurvedic classics and selected peer-reviewed biomedical literature on gout. Classical descriptions of Nidana, Samprapti, Rupa, Bheda and Chikitsa Siddhanta were synthesized. Gout pathophysiology, clinical features, classification and management principles were compared with the Ayurvedic framework. Results & Discussion: The Ayurvedic model emphasizes constitutional, dietary, metabolic and circulatory factors, whereas gout is defined by monosodium urate crystal deposition. Integrating both frameworks may improve conceptual understanding but does not replace disease-specific diagnostic confirmation. Conclusion: Vatarakta provides a valuable Ayurvedic framework for understanding gout-like inflammatory arthritis. Careful correlation, rather than one-to-one equivalence, offers the most scientifically defensible approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

GBD 2021 Gout Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of gout, 1990-2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024;6(8):e507-e517.

Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek A. Gout. Lancet. 2021;397(10287):1843-1855.

Agnivesha. Charaka Samhita. Revised by Charaka and Dridhabala. Sharma RK, Dash B, translators. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office; 2014.

Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104:333-339.

Agnivesha. Charaka Samhita: Chikitsa Sthana, Vatarakta Chikitsa Adhyaya. Sharma RK, Dash B, translators. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office; 2014.

Sushruta. Sushruta Samhita. Sharma PV, translator. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Visvabharati; 2013.

Vagbhata. Ashtanga Hridaya. Murthy KRS, translator. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Krishnadas Academy; 2018.

Madhavakara. Madhava Nidana (Roga Viniscaya). Murthy KRS, translator. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2016.

Bhavamishra. Bhavaprakasha. Mishra BS, Vaishya R, editors. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Bhawan; 2018.

Govind Das Sen. Bhaisajya Ratnavali. Mishra S, editor. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2019.

Chakrapanidatta. Chakradatta. Sharma PV, translator. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2007.

Yogaratnakara. Shastri L, editor. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Prakashan; 2017.

Neogi T, Jansen TLTA, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D, et al. 2015 gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(10):2557-2568.

Martinon F, Petrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237-241.

FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(6):744-760.

Doherty M, Jenkins W, Richardson H, Sarmanova A, Abhishek A, Ashton D, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10156):1403-1412.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Review Article