AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH STUDY DESIGNS
Abstract
The choice of the study design is a major determinant of scientific quality and clinical value of a research study. To select an appropriate study design is a perplex task for novice as well as veterans in research. AYUSH systems of medicines have evidence database showing the effectiveness in a wide range of clinical conditions, yet improving the quality of trials by well- designed studies is indispensable to demonstrate widespread utility on more scientific grounds. This article describes the structured classification of research designs done on the basis of a selective literature search concerning medical research. The study design and type that can best answer the particular research question at hand must be determined not only on a scientific basis, but also in view of the available resources, ethical issues and practical feasibility of study.
Keywords: Study design, Clinical trial phases, Observational studies, Experimental studies. Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).
References
Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R. Study designs: Part 1 - An overview and classification. Perspect Clin Res. 2018;9(4):184-186. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_124_18
Nair B. Clinical Trial Designs. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2019;10(2):193-201. doi:10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_475_18
Mathie RT. Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2015;104(4):328-332. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2015.05.003
Khurana A. Research design in Homoeopathy: A perspective. Indian J Res Homoeopathy [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 7];13:207-8. Available from: http://www.ijrh.org/text.asp?2019/13/4/207/274026
Lim HJ, Hoffmann RG. Study design: The basics. Methods Mol Biol. 2007; 404:1‐17.
Umscheid CA, Margolis DJ, Grossman CE. Key concepts of clinical trials: A narrative review. Postgrad Med. 2011;123:194‐204.
Kapoor MC. Types of studies and research design. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(9):626-630. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.190616
Omair A. Selecting the appropriate study design for your research: Descriptive study designs. J Health Spec [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 22];3:153-6. Available from: https://www.thejhs.org/text.asp?2015/3/3/153/159892
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Descriptive studies: What they can and cannot do. Lancet 2002;359:145-9.
Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R. Study designs: Part 3 - Analytical observational studies. Perspect Clin Res. 2019;10(2):91-94. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_35_19
Evans SR. Fundamentals of clinical trial design. J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2010;3(1):19-27. doi:10.6030/1939-067x-3.1.19
Ryan EG, Stallard N, Lall R, Ji C, Perkins GD, Gates S. Bayesian group sequential designs for phase III emergency medicine trials: a case study using the PARAMEDIC2 trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):84. Published 2020 Jan 14. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-4024-x
Ryan EG, Bruce J, Metcalfe AJ, et al. Using Bayesian adaptive designs to improve phase III trials: a respiratory care example. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):99. Published 2019 May 14. doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0739-3
Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(2):199-210. doi:10.11613/BM.2014.022
Schweizer ML, Braun BI, Milstone AM. Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship-Quasi-Experimental Designs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(10):1135-1140. doi:10.1017/ice.2016.117
Christensen E. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. Journal of Hepatology. 2007 May;46(5):947-954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep
Nolan SJ, Hambleton I, Dwan K. The Use and Reporting of the Cross-Over Study Design in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Assessment. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159014. Published 2016 Jul 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159014
Baker TB, Smith SS, Bolt DM, et al. Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer. Behav Ther. 2017;48(4):567-580. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.12.005
Pennell ML, Hade EM, Murray DM, Rhoda DA. Cutoff designs for community-based intervention studies [published correction appears in Stat Med. 2011 Sep 20;30(21):2669]. Stat Med. 2011;30(15):1865-1882. doi:10.1002/sim.4237
Pennell ML, Hade EM, Murray DM, Rhoda DA. Cutoff designs for community-based intervention studies [published correction appears in Stat Med. 2011 Sep 20;30(21):2669]. Stat Med. 2011;30(15):1865-1882. doi:10.1002/sim.4237
